Hacia un urbanismo inteligente genuinamente humanizador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52749/fh.v2i4.1Palabras clave:
Smart Cities, ciudadanía, justicia social, derecho a la ciudad, futuroResumen
En este artículo se analiza cómo, siguiendo a David Harvey (1973), producir un urbanismo inteligente verdaderamente humanizador. Harvey lo hace utilizando una lente orientada al futuro para esbozar los tipos de trabajo necesarios para reimaginar, replantear y rehacer las ciudades inteligentes. Sostengo que, por un lado, es necesario producir un "futuro presente" alternativo que cambie la lógica anticipatoria de las ciudades inteligentes para abordar las desigualdades persistentes, los prejuicios y la discriminación, y que esté arraigado en nociones de justicia, equidad, ética y democracia. Por otro lado, es necesario desbaratar el "futuro presente" del urbanismo inteligente neoliberal, yendo más allá de las políticas mínimas para promulgar intervenciones estratégicas sostenidas, dirigidas por el público, diseñadas para crear iniciativas de ciudades inteligentes más inclusivas. Ambas tácticas exigen la elaboración de una visión profundamente normativa de las ciudades inteligentes que esté arraigada en las ideas de ciudadanía, justicia social, bien público y derecho a la ciudad que debe desarrollarse conjuntamente con los ciudadanos.
Descargas
Citas
Adam, B. (2008). Of timespaces, futurescapes and timeprints. Presentation at Lüneburg University. Retrieved from http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/futures/conf_
ba_lueneberg170608.pdf. Accessed on June 8, 2018).
Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters. Leiden: Brill.
Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 777 798.
Bousquet, C. (2018). Algorithmic fairness: Tackling bias in city algorithms. Data-
Smart City Solutions. Retrieved from https://datasmart.ash.harvard.edu/news/
article/algorithmic-fairness-tackling-bias-city-algorithms. Accessed on September 18, 2018.
Büscher, M. (2017). The mobile utopia experiment. In J. Southern, E. Rose, &
L. O’Keeffe (Eds.), Mobile utopia: Art and experiments. Exhibition catalogue (pp.
18). Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/89847/1/AMCatalogue_inners_
lok.pdf
Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2018a). Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: Up and down
the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal.
doi:10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8
Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2018b). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neo- liberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning
C: Politics and Space (online first). doi:10.1177/0263774X18806508
Cockayne, D., & Richardson, L. (2017). Queering code/space: The co-production of
socio-sexual codes and digital technologies. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(11), 1642 1658.
Coletta, C., Evans, L., Heaphy, L., & Kitchin, R. (Eds.). (2019). Creating smart cit- ies. London: Routledge.
Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbani- zation’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1),
22.
Datta, A. (2016). Introduction: Fast cities in an urban age. In A. Datta & A. Shaban
(Eds.), Mega-urbanization in the global south: Fast cities and new urban utopias of the postcolonial state (pp. 1 27). London: Routledge.
Datta, A. (2018). The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: Smart citizenship in the making of India’s 100 smart cities. Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12225
Datta, A., & Shaban, A. (Eds.). (2016). Mega-urbanization in the global south: Fast
cities and new urban utopias of the postcolonial state. London: Routledge.
de Waal, M., de Lange, M., & Bouw, M. (2018). The hackable city cahier #1. The
hackable city: A model for collaborative citymaking. Amsterdam: The Hackable
City. http://thehackablecity.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/05dc59-Cahier-1- NAM-EV_.pdf
Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place
and Culture, 25(5), 629 644.
Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Raven, R. (Eds.). (2016). The experimental city. London: Routledge.
Halpern, O., & Günel, G. (2017). Demoing unto death: Smart cities, environment,
AU:3
and preemptive hope. Fibreculture, 29. doi:10.15307/fcj.29.215.2017 AU:4
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progres-
sive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303 320.
Janu, S. (2017). On-the-go settlements: Understanding urban informality through its
digital substructure. Urbanisation, 2(2), 116 134.
Jefferson, B. J. (2018a). Computerizing carceral space: Coded geographies of crimi-
nalization and capture in New York City. Environment and Planning A (online
first). doi:10.1177/1367549417708437
Jefferson, B. J. (2018b). Policing, data, and power-geometry: Intersections of crime analytics and race in urban restructuring. Urban Geography (online first).
doi:10.1080/02723638.2018.1446587
Karvonen, A., Cugurullo, F., & Caprotti, F. (Eds.). (2018). Inside smart cities:
Place, politics and urban innovation. London: Routledge.
Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings.
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131 136.
Kitchin, R. (2018). The timescape of smart cities. Annals of the Association of
American Geographers (online first).
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Leszczynski, A., & Elwood, S. (2015). Feminist geographies of new spatial media.
The Canadian Geographer, 59(1), 12 28.
Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society.
Palgrave. AU:5
Macgilchrist, F., & Bohmig, I. (2012). Blogs, genes and immigration: Online media
and minimal politics. Media, Culture and Society, 34(1), 83 100.
March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2018). Barcelona: From corporate smart city to
technological sovereignty. In Karvonen, A., Cugurullo, F., & F. Caprotti (Eds.),
Inside smart cities: Place, politics and urban innovation (pp. 229 243). London:
Routledge.
Marcuse, P. (2012). Whose right(s) to what city. In N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, &
M. Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city (pp. 24 41). London: Routledge.
Marvin, S., & Silver, J. (2016). The urban laboratory and emerging sites of urban experimentation. In J. Evans, A. Karvonen, & R. Raven (Eds.), The experimental
city (pp. 47 60). London: Routledge.
Mason, P. (2016). Postcapitalism and the city. Keynote address at the Barcelona
Initiative for Technological Sovereignty. Medium. Retrieved from https:// medium.com/mosquito-ridge/postcapitalism-and-the-city-6dda80bc201d
McLaren, D., & Agyeman, J. (2015). Sharing cities: A case for truly smart and sus-
tainable cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures,
(4), 341 362.
Morozov, E., & Bria, F. (2018). Rethinking smart cities: Democratizing urban tech-
nology. New York, NY: Rosa Luxemberg Stiftung. Retrieved from http://www. rosalux-nyc.org/rethinking-the-smart-city/
Poli, R. (2015). Social foresight. On the Horizon, 23(2), 85 99.
Rangaswamy, N., & Nair, S. (2012). The PC in an Indian urban slum: Enterprise
and entrepreneurship in ICT4D 2.0. Information Technology for Development, 18(2), 163—180.
Rose, G. (2017). Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers,
(4), 779 793.
Schrock, A. (2018). Civic tech: Making technology work for people. California:
Rogue Academic Press.
Shelton, T., & Lodato, T. (in press). Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and
(non)participation in the making of the smart city. City.
Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’.
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 13 25.
Shwayri, S. (2018). Life in smart Seoul: The female factor. In A. Karvonen,
F. Cugurullo, & F. Caprotti (Eds.), Inside smart cities: Place, politics and urban innovation. London: Routledge.
Söderström, O., Paasche, T., & Klauser, F. (2014). Smart cities as corporate story- telling. City, 18(3), 307 320.
Talvard, F. (2019). Can urban “miracles” be engineered in laboratories? Turning Medellín into a model city for the Global South. In C. Coletta, L. Evans,
L. Heaphy, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), (2019) Creating smart cities (pp. 62 75). London: Routledge.
Trencher, G., & Karvonen, A. (2018). Innovating for an aging society: Insights from two Japanese smart cities. In A. Karvonen, F. Cugurullo, & F. Caprotti (Eds.),
Inside smart cities: Place, politics and urban innovation. London: Routledge. Watson, V. (2014). African urban fantasies: Dreams or nightmares? Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 215 231.
White, J. (2016). Anticipatory logics of the smart city’s global imaginary. Urban
Geography, 37(4), 572—589.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Rob Kitchin
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
El autor de cada artículo o contribución académica publicada en Futuro Hoy se compromete a otorgar derechos de uso a otros gracias al registro en Creative Commons BY 4.0 que la Editorial ha tramitado para su obra. Esto permite el acceso gratuito e inmediato a la obra y permite a cualquier usuario leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o vincular acceder a los textos completos de los artículos, rastrearlos para indexarlos, pasarlos como datos al software o utilizarlos para cualquier otro propósito legal. Cada autor mantiene los derechos de su obra. La revista Futuro Hoy posee los derechos de publicación de cada artículo. La revista no se responsabiliza por los comentarios vertidos por cada autor.
